“Denial” (2016)

denial

Holocaust expert Deborah Lipstadt (Rachel Weisz) and her attorneys, preparing for court room battle.

Those of us who have not lived under a rock all our lives are pretty familiar with certain truths; i.e., the world is round, astronauts actually landed on the moon, and atrocities like the Holocaust really happened.  But here’s a question:  What if you had to go into a court of law and prove that these things are true?  What facts would you use to make your case?

That is the challenge facing Holocaust expert Deborah Lipstadt (Rachel Weisz) in the docudrama Denial, based on a British libel case from 2000.  In the film, plaintiff David Irving (Timothy Spall), alleges that Ms. Lipstadt has characterized his writings and public statements as Holocaust denial in her book, Denying the Holocaust.  He sues both Lipstadt and her UK publisher, Penguin.

Lipstadt soon discovers the difficulty of her situation.  In British civil court, the defendant is the one who must prove their position, not the plaintiff.  Therefore, Lipstadt’s legal team must provide evidence that the Holocaust really happened, in order to defend her written statements in Denying the Holocaust that Irving systematically denied it.

Most legal dramas center on action in the courtroom.  Denial focuses on the fireworks behind the scenes; specifically Lipstadt’s disagreement with the way her lawyers wish to litigate the trial.  For example, she is horrified when her team tells her that neither she nor living Holocaust survivors will be allowed to testify.  Instead, the team will thoroughly review Irving’s diaries regarding involvement with rightwing groups, and they will search out forensic evidence related to the central point of the trial:  The massacre of Jews at Auschwitz.  The question is whether the lawyers’ measured plan of attack in the courtroom will work.  Is it a mistake to leave Lipstadt and the survivors out of the proceedings?

Weitz is pretty good as Lipstadt, but the real standouts are Timothy Spall as Irving and Tom Wilkinson as defense advocate Richard Rampton.  These two actors provide the most compelling in-court dramatics of the entire film.

It is most unfortunate that Denial was not in wide release, at least in my area.  It should be seen by everyone, especially young people.  The film teaches us a couple of lessons:   1) We must never forget the Holocaust.  2) In an age where fake news and “alternative facts” seem to run rampant all over the media, it is extremely important to carefully verify facts and information before drawing conclusions about anything, especially history.

*****

You can download Denial from amazon.com using the following link:

//ws-na.amazon-adsystem.com/widgets/q?ServiceVersion=20070822&OneJS=1&Operation=GetAdHtml&MarketPlace=US&source=ac&ref=tf_til&ad_type=product_link&tracking_id=spcooperveriz-20&marketplace=amazon&region=US&placement=B01LTHNHK2&asins=B01LTHNHK2&linkId=c2168222c63df7e01a5204838f4028a5&show_border=false&link_opens_in_new_window=false&price_color=333333&title_color=0066c0&bg_color=ffffff

You can also find Deborah Lipstadt’s book about the libel suit,  History on Trial:  My Day in Court with a Holocaust Denier,”  at amazon.com.

Pluses:  Excellent performances from Timothy Spall and Tom Wilkinson; moving scene concerning Auschwitz location.

Minus:  Sometimes lags in dramatic propulsion.

Cast:  Rachel Weisz, Tom Wilkinson, Timothy Spall, Andrew Scott, Lack Lowden, Caren Pistorious, Alex Jennings.

Director:  Mick Jackson

Rating:  PG-13

In color.

Length:  110

7 thoughts on ““Denial” (2016)”

  1. Well said, Sarah. I have known three Holocaust survivors, and find it reprehensible that anyone would deny that horrendous series of events. As the event recedes in history, I fear that it will become more commonplace. I look forward to watching this movie.

    Like

    1. Hi Kay, and thanks for posting your reply on the cinemascooper comment section. This encourages others to do the same.

      I have never read any of David Irving’s materials and am not familiar with his need to justify the views he holds regarding WW2 or the Holocaust. According to the film, Irving doesn’t categorically deny that Jews were killed, but he minimizes the numbers and, if I remember correctly, attributes the deaths to civilian casualty.

      As you will see in the film, Irving’s lawsuit centered on Auschwitz, the most notorious of the concentrations camps. However, Lipstadt’s attorneys correctly assert that the camp was originally a work camp. Therefore, with just blueprint evidence it might be argued that the forensics don’t show mass extermination. This is the argument that Lipstadt’s attorneys have to counter with their own forensics.

      By the way, while I would recommend that you watch the film as an effective teaching tool, I was not thrilled at how the screenwriters maintain dramatic intensity. The two actors I complimented in my review truly are great; it’s just that the screenplay is not.

      I’m almost finished with my “Hidden Figures” review and am excited to publish that tomorrow. It’s an entertaining, feelgood movie about the unsung heroes (technicians, mathematicians, scientists) who got those astronauts into space. If I had a 10+ year old kid, I would DRAG them to see this film. I’ve already read one website devoted to kid and family-friendly films where children have given “Hidden Figures” a major thumbs up.

      Which brings me to another subject. I’m thinking of doing an article about movies featuring science/math/ technology in a way that will attract kids and adults. “October Sky,” about Homer Hickum, comes to mind. Do you know of any others?

      Hope you are doing well. Don’t spend too much money at the rock hound convention, hehe!

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Great review of a great film. While this is not for entertainment, it is a strong story that is well told. It is also an important film, especially as we are in an era where the denialists are in power in many places around the world. I also gave it 8 out of 10; it is an under-acclaimed film.

    Like

  3. Thank you for eloquently expressing the importance of this film! Great review. Definition of essential viewing, especially in light of recent events.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s